Recently Asked Questions - Trademark Office Action Responses

Page 6 of 11

Attorney Services

Attorney Services

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 5/11/2010
Hi: What does your attorney services include? Suppose the trademark office comes back and denies the trademark. Will the attorney review the issue and provide the correct response to the trademark office?
Government Property

Government Property

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 5/5/2010
Hello everyone, I want to know if change Serial Number for Equipment such Car, Power Generator belong to the US Government is a crime thanks
SECTION 2(a) IMMORAL OR SCANDALOUS REFUSAL

SECTION 2(a) IMMORAL OR SCANDALOUS REFUSAL

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 2/13/2010
I received a SECTION 2(a) IMMORAL OR SCANDALOUS REFUSAL from the trademark office, but I did not think my Trademark had the meaning of sounding like smut. Is there somewhere I can find actions where people have reversed this with the USPTO?
What is the process for canceling A trademark Application due to opposition?

What is the process for canceling A trademark Application due to opposition?

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 1/18/2010
What is the process for canceling A trademark Application due to opposition?
keranique

keranique

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 1/3/2010
I am readinfg a article on keranique in women's health newa and it claims to be FDA approved. MY research on the internet does not indicate this. All information I see is self claim infomation from the maker. There is not even a claim from a user that I was able to find. Please advise me if I am researching in the wrong area and send me the information reguarding your FDA approval and testomany on this product. I am interested in purchasing this product..
hair restoration

hair restoration

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 12/15/2009
Rating for Keranique
Interesting Scenario

Interesting Scenario

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 11/11/2009
Applicant does not file any Section 8/9 declaration.  Registration then canceled about 6 months ago.  Applicant files anew and recieves an office action with respect to geographically descriptiveness.   Is there any way to hold the USPTO responsible for approving the mark previously and not approving it now, e.g. estoppel argument?  I have looked around and cannot find the answer.

Regards,
Office Action - What Do I Do Next?

Office Action - What Do I Do Next?

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 11/11/2009
I received an email from the trademark office i think i know what it means. but if someone could explain it that would be great . see attachment.
tony
antminer@yahoo.com
Is this liklihood of confusion argument going in the right direction?

Is this liklihood of confusion argument going in the right direction?

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 11/11/2009
I found this website today while searching for effective ways to respond to an office action regarding liklihood of confusion. I think everyone on here is very helpful and courteous.

Anyway, my question. Would distinguishing my trademark application with a registered mark by arguing my mark is a trademark and the registered mark is a servicemark sufficient? Alone, it may not be but our names are a tad bit dissimilar. Think chocolate milk and chocolatemilky.

This is my ...
I received my NOA...I have a question or 2 or 4 or 10

I received my NOA...I have a question or 2 or 4 or 10

In Trademark Office Action Responses    -  updated on 11/11/2009
Let me preface this with I apologize for asking what may be EXTREMELY obvious to others on this site.

I received my NOA for the application that I placed for a Registered Trademark. According to the letter I am to put in place the trademark. I applied to use it on Clothing, T-shirts, Hats, etc. and additionally adhesive notepads.

I am not to use the Registered Trademark logo correct? ( ? ) If that's not used then how is my trademark protected? It's my understan...